Refine your search
Collections
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Dasgupta, Soumya
- Wildlife Watch in the Indian Himalayan Region
Abstract Views :247 |
PDF Views:72
Authors
Affiliations
1 Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 002, IN
1 Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 002, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 114, No 04 (2018), Pagination: 718-718Abstract
The Indian Himalayan Region (IHR) is one of the rich biodiversity regions of the world with over 10,000 plants, 300 mammals, 977 birds, 281 herpetofauna, 269 fishes, several species of invertebrates and microorganisms, many of which have global conservation significance. Despite significant ecological, hydrological and biological values, the fragile mountain ecosystems in the IHR are seriously threatened due to increasing anthropogenic pressures, mainly development. In the IHR, wildlife species are threatened due to poaching for meat, illegal wildlife trade, negative human–wildlife interactions (conflicts), habitat loss, habitat fragmentation and degradation due to developmental activities and natural resource use by humans. These have led to a decline in wildlife population, reduction in distribution range and in some cases local extinction of species.Full Text
References
- Conservation International 2016, accessed on 22 September 2016.
- Anon., Himalayas Climate Change portal: Task Force 4: Micro Flora and Fauna and Wildlife and Animal Population, 2015; http://knowledgeportal-nmshe.in/ (accessed on 11 May 2016).
- Sathyakumar, S. and Bashir, T., In Mountain Ecosystem and Man (eds Arora, S. et al.), Soil Conservation Society of India, New Delhi, 2010, pp. 324–345.
- Matthew, R. A., In Strategic Asia–11: Asia’s Rising Power and America’s Continued Purpose (eds Tellis, A. J., Marble, A. and Tanner, T.), The National Bureau of Asian Research, Seattle, Washington, 2010.
- Anon., National Mission for Sustaining the Himalayan Eco-System under National Action Plan on Climate Change. Mission document, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, 2010.
- Role of Vegetation Characteristics on the Distribution of Three Hornbill Species in and around Pakke Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh, India
Abstract Views :112 |
PDF Views:61
Authors
Affiliations
1 Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, IN
2 Postgraduate Department of Conservation Biology, Durgapur Government College, Jawahar Lal Nehru Road, Durgapur 713 214, IN
3 Wildlife Trust of India, F13, Sector 8, Noida 201 301, IN
1 Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, IN
2 Postgraduate Department of Conservation Biology, Durgapur Government College, Jawahar Lal Nehru Road, Durgapur 713 214, IN
3 Wildlife Trust of India, F13, Sector 8, Noida 201 301, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 124, No 5 (2023), Pagination: 617-625Abstract
The change in physiognomic and floristic characteristics of vegetation composition affects the bird community assemblage and the relative abundance of different species within the community. Hornbills are mutualistic to the forest with their dependency on roosting, nesting and feeding, and helping in the regeneration of different plant species by dispersing the seeds. The relationship between various vegetation characteristics and the relative abundance of three hornbill species (Great Pied Hornbill (GPH, Buceros bicornis), Wreathed Hornbill (Rhyticeros undulatus) and Oriental Pied Hornbill (OPH, Anthracoceros albirostris)) was studied in and around Pakke Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh, India. We walked transects (n = 11; 22 walks) in three study sites to detect hornbills. Vegetation sampling was done using circular plots (n = 33; 10 m radius) at every 400 m interval along each transect. Encounter rate (1.5 ± 0.188/km) of GPH was highest in the protected and undisturbed forest area, where food and roosting tree density were also high (114/ha). OPH was common in both the sites in the Reserve, near riverine forests (0.75 ± 0.25/km) and the dense undisturbed forest (0.875 ± 0.226/km). Multivariate analysis revealed that tree density, presence of fruiting trees (utilized by hornbills), canopy cover and tree diversity in a particular area are the major factors responsible for the assemblage of more than one hornbill species. The study shows that protection of forest patches to keep the diversity and density of the tree species intact is crucial for the survival and distribution of hornbills in the landscape.Keywords
Forest Structure, Hornbill Abundance, Mutualism, Tiger Reserve, Vegetation Characteristics.Full Text
References
- Cody, M. L. (ed.), Habitat Selection in Birds, Academic Press, New York, USA, 1985, p. 560.
- Terborgh, J., Robinson, S. K., Parker, T. A., Munn, C. A. and Pierpont, N., Structure and organization of an Amazonian forest bird community. Ecol. Monogr., 1990, 60, 213–238.
- Weins, J. A., The Ecology of Bird Community, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1992, vol. 2, p. 336.
- Morrison, M. C., Marcot, B. G. and Mannan, R. W., Wildlife Habitat Relationships: Concepts and Applications, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, USA, 1992, p. 371.
- Block, W. M. and Brennan, L. A., The habitat concept in ornithology. Curr. Ornithol., 1993, 11, 35–91.
- Rotenberry, J. T., The role of habitat in avian community composition: physiognomy or floristics? Oecologia, 1985, 67, 213–217.
- Weins, J. A., Rotenberry, J. T. and Van Horne, B., Habitat occupancy patterns of North American Shrubsteppe birds: the effect of spatial scale. Oikos, 1987, 48, 132–147.
- Datta, A. and Rawat, G. S., Nest site selection and nesting success of three hornbill species in Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India. Buceros bicornis, Aceros undulatus and Anthoceros albirostris. Bird Conserv. Int., 2004, 14, S39–S52; https://doi.org/10.1017/S095927-0905000213.
- Rottenbery, J. T., Why measure bird habitat? The use of multivariate statistics in studies of wildlife habitat. In USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87 (ed. Capen, D.), USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, USA, 1981, pp. 29–32.
- Thinh, V. T., Bird species richness and diversity in relation to vegetation in Bavi National Park, Vietnam. Ornithol. Sci., 2006, 5(1), 121–125.
- Gould, S. F. and Mackey, B. G., Site vegetation characteristics are more important than landscape context in determining bird assemblages in revegetation. Restor. Ecol., 2015, 23, 670–680; doi: 10.1111/rec.12222.
- Naniwadekar, R., Chaplod, S., Datta, A., Rathore, A. and Sridhar, H., Large frugivore matter: insights from network and seed dispersal effectiveness approaches. J. Anim. Ecol., 2019, 88, 1250–1262; https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13005.
- MacArthur, R. H. and MacArthur, J. W., On bird species richness. Ecology, 1961, 42, 594–598.
- Balda, R. P., Foliage use by birds of the oak–juniper wood land and ponderosa pine forest in southeastern Arizona. Condor, 1969, 71, 399–412.
- Karr, J. and Roth, R., Vegetation structure and avian diversity in several New World areas. Am. Nat., 1971, 115, 423–435; doi:10.1086/282735.
- Rice, J., Habitat selection attributes of an avian community: a discriminant analysis investigation. Ecol. Monogr., 1983, 53, 263–290.
- Dauglas, D. C., Ratti, J. T., Black, R. A. and Alldredge, R. A., Avian habitat associations in riparian zones of Idaho’s Centennial Mountains. Wilson Bull., 1992, 104, 485–500.
- Dos Anjos, L. et al., Insights on the functional composition of specialist and generalist birds throughout continuous and fragmented forests. Ecol. Evol., 2019, 9(11), 6318–6328; doi:10.1002/ece3.5204. PMID: 31236223; PMCID: PMC6580428.
- Kemp, A. C. and Woodcock, M., The Hornbills: Bucerotiformes, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1995, ISBN 0-19-857729-X.
- Datta, A. and Rawat, G. S., Foraging patterns of sympatric hornbills during the non breeding season in Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. Biotropica, 2003, 35(2), 208–218; doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2003.tb00280.x.S2CID86157117.
- Krishna, C. M., Sarma, K. and Kumar, A., Rapid assessment of Wreathed Hornbill Aceros undulatus (Aves: Bucerotidae) populations and conservation issues in fragmented lowland tropical forests of Arunachal Pradesh, India. J. Threat. Taxa, 2012, 4(14), 3342–3348; doi:10.11609/JoTT.o2969.3342-8.
- Holbrook, K. M. and Smith, T. B., Seed dispersal and movement patterns in two species of Ceratogymna hornbills in a West African tropical lowland forest. Oecologia, 2000, 125(2), 249–257; https://doi.org/10.1007/s0004420000445.
- Sethi, P. and Howe, H. F., Fruit removal by hornbills in a semi evergreen forest of the Indian Eastern Himalaya. J. Trop. Ecol., 2012, 28, 531–541.
- Naniwadekar, R., Seed dispersal by hornbill, conservation status and the consequences of their decline in tropical forest of Arunachal Pradesh. Ph D thesis submitted to Manipal University, Karnataka, 2014; http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/32462?Mode=full (accessed on 17 February 2021).
- Neuschulz, E. et al., Pollination and seed dispersal are the most threatened processes of plant regeneration. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, 29839; https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29839.
- Wang, B. C. and Smith, T. B., Closing the seed dispersal loop. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2002, 17, 379–386.
- Wenny, D., Sekercioglu, C., Whelan, C. and Cordeiro, N., Seed dispersal by fruit-eating birds. In Ecosystem Services: Seed Dispersal by Terrestrial Avian Frugivores, Ecological Society of America, 2012, pp. 107–146.
- Egerer, M. H., Fricke, E. C. and Rodgers, H. S., Seed dispersal as an ecosystem service: frugivore loss leads to decline of a socially valued plant, Capsicum frutescens. Ecol. Appl., 2018, 28, 655–667; doi:10.1002/eap.1667.
- Kemp, A. C., Family Bucerotidae (hornbills). In Handbook of the Birds of the World (eds Hoyo, J. et al.), Lynx Editions, Barcelona, Spain, 2001, vol. 6, pp. 436–523.
- Datta, A., Hornbill abundance in unlogged forest, selectively logged forest and a forest plantation in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Oryx, 1998, 32, 285–294.
- Sethi, P. and Howe, H. F., Recruitment of hornbill-dispersed trees in hunted and logged forests of the Indian Eastern Himalaya. Conserv. Biol., 2009, 23, 710–718; doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008. 01155.x; PMID:19220369.
- Dasgupta, S. and Hilaluddin, Differential effects of hunting on populations of hornbills and imperial pigeons in the rainforests of the Eastern Indian Himalaya. Indian For., 2012, 138(10), 902–909; Online ISSN: 0019-4816.
- Choudhury, A., The status of endangered species in northeast India. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 2006, 103, 157–167.
- Sheth, C., Datta, A. and Parashuram, D., Persistent loss of biologically-rich tropical forests in the Indian Eastern Himalaya. Silva Fenn., 2020, 54, 3; https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10373.
- Katti, M., Singh, P., Manjrekar, N., Sharma, D. and Mukherjee, S., An ornithological survey in Eastern Arunachal Pradesh, India. Forktail, 1992, 7, 75–89.
- Datta, A. and Goyal, S. P., Responses of diurnal tree squirrels to selective logging in western Arunachal Pradesh. Curr. Sci., 2008, 95, 895–902.
- Fa, J., Peres, C. A. and Meeuwig, J., Bushmeat exploitation in tropical forests: an intercontinental comparison. Conserv. Biol., 2002, 16, 232–237.
- Naniwadekar, R., Shukla, U., Isvaran, K. and Datta, A., Reduced hornbill abundance associated with low seed arrival and altered recruitment in a hunted and logged tropical forest. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(3), e0120062; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120062.
- Datta, A. and Rawat, G. S., Dispersal modes and spatial patterns of tree species in a tropical forest in Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. Trop. Conserv. Sci., 2008, 1, 163–185.
- Champion, H. G. and Seth, S. K., A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India, Government of India Press, New Delhi, 1968, p. 404.
- Blozan, W., Tree measuring guidelines of the eastern native tree society. Bull. East. Native Tree Soc., 2006, 1, 3–10; http://www.nativetreesociety.org/bulletin/b1_1/bulletin1_1.htm
- Canfield, R. H., Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. J. For., 1941, 45, 388–394.
- O’Brien, R. A., Comparison of overstory canopy cover estimates on forest survey plots. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper INT-417, Ogden, UT, USA, 1989, p. 5.
- Thomas, L. et al., Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. J. Appl. Ecol., 2010, 47, 5–14; doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01737.x.
- Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Laake, J. L., Borchers, D. L. and Thomas, L., Introduction to Distance Sampling, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2001.
- Anderson, M. J., Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online (eds Balakrishnan, N. et al.), 2017; doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat07841.
- Legendre, P., Borcard, D. and Peres-Neto, P. R., Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol. Monogr., 2005, 75, 435–450.
- Clarke, K. R., Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. Ecol., 1993, 18, 117–143.
- R version 3.4.4 (2018-03-15) R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2018; http://www.R-project.org/
- Akaike, H., Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Second International Symposium on Information Theory (eds Petrov, B. N. and Csáki, F.), Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary, 1973, pp. 267–281.
- Raman, S. T. R. and Mudappa, D., Correlates of hornbill distribution and abundance in rainforest fragments in the southern Western Ghats, India. Bird Conserv. Int., 2003, 13, 199–212.
- Anggraini, K., Kinnaird, M. F. and O’Brien, T. G., The effects of fruit availability and habitat disturbance on an assemblage of Sumatran hornbills. Bird Conserv. Int., 2000, 10, 189–202.
- Kinnaird, M. F., O’Brien, T. G. and Suryadi, S., Population fluctuation in Sulawesi Red-Knobbed hornbills: tracking figs in space and time. Auk, 1996, 113, 431–440.
- Poonswad, P. and Tsuji, A., Ranges of males of the Great Hornbill Buceros bicornis, Brown Hornbill Ptilolaemus tickelli and Wreathed Hornbill Rhyticeros undulatusin KhaoYai National Park, Thailand. Ibis, 1994, 136, 79–86.